That soft energetic interconnection, “tangible,” with feeling.

People have been wondering . . .

I’ve been moving along with that enhanced sense of Reality and Meaningfulness, with Intent.

If I was a Yogi, or a Buddhist, there would be no problem here.

I’ve written it up, though, into a Western version. I got that intermediate position, which would be OK for psychoanalysis, or a Muslim. Overall, this is just our psychology, as I see it.

I got this switched around into a more developmental orientation. With intent, we can achieve an “enhanced context.” Originally, I went past the separate mode, and experienced that sense of “mutual arising” . . . “A mutual arising of Self and Existence.” With experiences of intent and the figure/ground, there were these other “activations” . . . further extensions of our core identity within a greater context!

I’m not anti-social; but there are optimums. Those should be in your game as well.

I’ve had some experiences: they were so realistic, I started working on those and moving in that direction instead. I wasn’t lured into your ideas and symbols, as if these were it. These were experiences of Reality!

So, rather than the ego or object staying the same, and wondering if it could be better or worse; if one views the connection here as if it were a figure/ground, potentially, there can be much more involved. There can be other activations, intrinsic change: “A Self entwined within the Universe in an interactive field of meaning and knowledge.”

I may have been caught up in that personal self layer; but these days I also know of that “second attention,” and the “life world within the greater world.”

When I was thinking of this issue, and “incarnations,” it was like I saw this younger child, giving me a consideration, and a “nod.” Likewise, with one a bit older, next to a Christmas tree, all lit up.

Then, in considering that potential autistic issue, I got an image of this loving dad like person coming in, and holding my head with his loving hands.